Charges Filed Against Attorney Dan Warner Aaron Kelly & Raees Mohamed

View More Categories


Fake Lawsuits Fake Defendants  Fake Notary's Fake Signatures Fake Court Documents .

State Bar File Took It Upon Themselves To File Charges  Against Dan Warner  Aaron Kelly and Raees Mohamed That Head Up The Kelly Warner Law Firm Located In Scottsdale Arizona.

After a 16 month investigation an official charges have been filed against Arizona based law firm Kelly Warner Law and the attorneys.  Sources say "criminal charges are possible due to the nature of the allegations and the investigation could expand into the rest of the firm including the paralegal and other staff.

Other sources say Federal RICO Suit Is  Imminent against members of the firm and Richart Ruddie  as well others not named in the complaint.

  • Daniel R Warner
  • Aaron Kelly
  •  Raees Mohamed.

The charges include:

  • Fake Lawsuits
  • Fake Defendants 
  • Fake Notary's
  • Fake Signatures
  • Fake Court Documents

We will have more on this story as it develops.


dan warner supreme court Complaint

Arizona Attorneys Daniel Warner  Aaron Kelly and Raees Mohamed Accused Of Fraud By State Bar.

Attorney Dan Warner   Sources claim Erika Warner must have aware of the ongoing alleged frauds.

Attorney Raees Mohamed

Attorney Aaron Kelly & Angala Kelly





Digging deeper, we noticed that Krista Ivanski and Samantha Pierce have signatures that are strikingly similar, one significant similarity being the very distinguishable way that the “i” is dotted.

On a motion filed earlier in the case by Attorney Warner, the Notary is “Amanda Sparks of Fulton County,” but, once again, there is no Amanda Sparks in Fulton County. Volokh notes in his article that there is an Amanda Sparks in a different county with a different expiration date. So, it appears that the real Amanda Sparks may be a victim of identity theft.

In the image below, it appears that the handwriting for the “Amanda Sparks” notarization was also the same as that used for “Krista Ivanski” & “Samantha Pierce.”

In summation, this lawsuit, filed by Attorney Daniel Warner, appears to have the following characteristics:

  • Fake signatures
  • Fake notaries
  • Fake defendant, representing herself pro se
  • Purpose was to remove negative material from Google



Upon comparing the signatures and dates on these documents by the notary to the other documents, there are, again, notable similarities: